ME and Ophelia
Thursday, May 25, 2006
PICTURES OF THE $100 LAPTOP
1st working model of One Laptop Per Child (OLPC)
From May 23, 2006 blog entry by Pablo Halkyard at PSD blog - The World Bank Group:
Click here to learn about One Laptop per Child and view pictures of original green prototype with hand crank.
Photo: 1st working model (OLPC) - taken at 11:45 AM on May 23, 2006; cameraphone upload by ShoZu - Uploaded to flickr by Pete Barr-Watson
1st working model of One Laptop Per Child (OLPC)
From May 23, 2006 blog entry by Pablo Halkyard at PSD blog - The World Bank Group:
Pictures from the unveiling of the first working prototype of the $100 Laptop at the Seven Countries Task Force today. Green became orange, and the hand-crank is gone. Compare with Intel's sub-$400 entry and AMD's $185 version.Note, at the entry a techie commented: "Awesome. I want one. What is there to stop gringos from buying them all to have their recipes on the kitchen or to use as poolside or beach laptop?"
Click here to learn about One Laptop per Child and view pictures of original green prototype with hand crank.
Photo: 1st working model (OLPC) - taken at 11:45 AM on May 23, 2006; cameraphone upload by ShoZu - Uploaded to flickr by Pete Barr-Watson
# posted by Ingrid J. Jones @ 5/25/2006
0 comments
Tuesday, May 23, 2006
WEB INVENTOR SIR TIM BERNERS-LEE
Warns of 'dark' net
Today, a friend emailed me this BBC report with the message: "This is the man you and I are so grateful to/for. I'm always astonished, every day, to consider the ways in which the WWW has changed my outlook on life."
The web should remain neutral and resist attempts to fragment it into different services, web inventor Sir Tim Berners-Lee has said.
Recent attempts in the US to try to charge for different levels of online access web were not "part of the internet model," he said in Edinburgh.
He warned that if the US decided to go ahead with a two-tier internet, the network would enter "a dark period".
Sir Tim was speaking at the start of a conference on the future of the web.
"What's very important from my point of view is that there is one web," he said.
"Anyone that tries to chop it into two will find that their piece looks very boring."
An equal net
The British scientist developed the web in 1989 as an academic tool to allow scientists to share data. Since then it has exploded into every area of life.
However, as it has grown, there have been increasingly diverse opinions on how it should evolve.
The World Wide Web Consortium, of which Sir Tim is the director, believes in an open model.
This is based on the concept of network neutrality, where everyone has the same level of access to the web and that all data moving around the web is treated equally.
This view is backed by companies like Microsoft and Google, who have called for legislation to be introduced to guarantee net neutrality.
The first steps towards this were taken last week when members of the US House of Representatives introduced a net neutrality bill.
Pay model
But telecoms companies in the US do not agree. They would like to implement a two-tier system, where data from companies or institutions that can pay are given priority over those that cannot.
This has particularly become an issue with the transmission of TV shows over the internet, with some broadband providers wanting to charge content providers to carry the data.
The internet community believes this threatens the open model of the internet as broadband providers will become gatekeepers to the web's content.
Providers that can pay will be able to get a commercial advantage over those that cannot.
There is a fear that institutions like universities and charities would also suffer.
The web community is also worried that any charges would be passed on to the consumer.
Optimism
Sir Tim said this was "not the internet model". The "right" model, as exists at the moment, was that any content provider could pay for a connection to the internet and could then put any content on to the web with no discrimination.
Speaking to reporters in Edinburgh at the WWW2006 conference, he argued this was where the great benefit of the internet lay.
"You get this tremendous serendipity where I can search the internet and come across a site that I did not set out to look for," he said.
A two-tier system would mean that people would only have full access to those portions of the internet that they paid for and that some companies would be given priority over others.
But Sir Tim was optimistic that the internet would resist attempts to fragment.
"I think it is one and will remain as one," he said.
The WWW2006 conference will run until Friday at the International Conference Centre in Edinburgh.
Warns of 'dark' net
Today, a friend emailed me this BBC report with the message: "This is the man you and I are so grateful to/for. I'm always astonished, every day, to consider the ways in which the WWW has changed my outlook on life."
The web should remain neutral and resist attempts to fragment it into different services, web inventor Sir Tim Berners-Lee has said.
Recent attempts in the US to try to charge for different levels of online access web were not "part of the internet model," he said in Edinburgh.
He warned that if the US decided to go ahead with a two-tier internet, the network would enter "a dark period".
Sir Tim was speaking at the start of a conference on the future of the web.
"What's very important from my point of view is that there is one web," he said.
"Anyone that tries to chop it into two will find that their piece looks very boring."
An equal net
The British scientist developed the web in 1989 as an academic tool to allow scientists to share data. Since then it has exploded into every area of life.
However, as it has grown, there have been increasingly diverse opinions on how it should evolve.
The World Wide Web Consortium, of which Sir Tim is the director, believes in an open model.
This is based on the concept of network neutrality, where everyone has the same level of access to the web and that all data moving around the web is treated equally.
This view is backed by companies like Microsoft and Google, who have called for legislation to be introduced to guarantee net neutrality.
The first steps towards this were taken last week when members of the US House of Representatives introduced a net neutrality bill.
Pay model
But telecoms companies in the US do not agree. They would like to implement a two-tier system, where data from companies or institutions that can pay are given priority over those that cannot.
This has particularly become an issue with the transmission of TV shows over the internet, with some broadband providers wanting to charge content providers to carry the data.
The internet community believes this threatens the open model of the internet as broadband providers will become gatekeepers to the web's content.
Providers that can pay will be able to get a commercial advantage over those that cannot.
There is a fear that institutions like universities and charities would also suffer.
The web community is also worried that any charges would be passed on to the consumer.
Optimism
Sir Tim said this was "not the internet model". The "right" model, as exists at the moment, was that any content provider could pay for a connection to the internet and could then put any content on to the web with no discrimination.
Speaking to reporters in Edinburgh at the WWW2006 conference, he argued this was where the great benefit of the internet lay.
"You get this tremendous serendipity where I can search the internet and come across a site that I did not set out to look for," he said.
A two-tier system would mean that people would only have full access to those portions of the internet that they paid for and that some companies would be given priority over others.
But Sir Tim was optimistic that the internet would resist attempts to fragment.
"I think it is one and will remain as one," he said.
The WWW2006 conference will run until Friday at the International Conference Centre in Edinburgh.
# posted by Ingrid J. Jones @ 5/23/2006
0 comments
Thursday, May 04, 2006
CITIZEN JOURNALISM vs. MAINSTREAM MEDIA
'We Media Blog' blogs the 'We Media' Conference May 3-4, London
The BBC gets blogging and reports on global voices debating citizen journalism vs. mainstream media and how the media is changing.
The BBC's We Media blog provides live coverage of debates and ideas coming out of the We Media global forum.
The forum is a two-day conference being held in London on 3 and 4 May, hosted by the BBC, Reuters and the US-based think-tank the Media Center.
The event is looking at issues like trust, the role of media in a connected society and the power of consumers to make the news through citizen journalism.
The power of trust
The We Media Global Forum brings together the trailblazers of the connected society - the thinkers, innovators, investors, executives and activists seeking to tap the potential of digital networks connecting people everywhere. More about the Forum. See Forum blog
Seeing is believing
"The image used for the branding of the We Media conference in London has stirred up a debate in the blogosphere. We did not use the image on this blog as it did not fit our house style, but you can find it on the We Media site run by organisers The Media Center, a US think tank", writes BBC blogger Alfred Hermida May 2, 2006 - excerpt:
The image is of an Arab woman holding up an ink-stained finger. On his blog Salam Adil, an Iraqi living in London, questions the use of the photo. In a thoughtful analysis he decontructs the image, asking if the photograph was staged and questioning its authenticity.
Whether or not he is right, it highlights how delicate the issue of trust is. As he concludes: "If you can't trust this image, how can you trust the media?"
Click here to see sidebar list of confirmed participants to date - ranging from Reuters CEO Tom Glocer to British blogger Suw Charman.
American blogger Ethan Zuckerman is blogging the conference he's not attending keeping us up to date with what's going on there from an American perspective.
Many of us have English as our mother tongue but come from hugely different cultural and educational backgrounds which means we don't or can't feel or see things in the same light. Not sure why I've just added that line, I guess it's a cryptic note to myself as a reminder for future reference, and while I'm at it, pointers re my question What is Propaganda? and definitions of Propaganda - information that is designed to make people feel a certain way or to believe a certain thing:
PS Hello dear blogmates, sorry I've had to delete HaloScan commenting facility as email notification had broken and I couldn't access Admin to delete spam. It is possible to comment here via Blogger by clicking on the date at the end of each post. I'll have to contact Blogger for advice on how to fix template - meanwhile hope you don't mind continuing to email me instead.
'We Media Blog' blogs the 'We Media' Conference May 3-4, London
The BBC gets blogging and reports on global voices debating citizen journalism vs. mainstream media and how the media is changing.
The BBC's We Media blog provides live coverage of debates and ideas coming out of the We Media global forum.
The forum is a two-day conference being held in London on 3 and 4 May, hosted by the BBC, Reuters and the US-based think-tank the Media Center.
The event is looking at issues like trust, the role of media in a connected society and the power of consumers to make the news through citizen journalism.
The power of trust
The We Media Global Forum brings together the trailblazers of the connected society - the thinkers, innovators, investors, executives and activists seeking to tap the potential of digital networks connecting people everywhere. More about the Forum. See Forum blog
Seeing is believing
"The image used for the branding of the We Media conference in London has stirred up a debate in the blogosphere. We did not use the image on this blog as it did not fit our house style, but you can find it on the We Media site run by organisers The Media Center, a US think tank", writes BBC blogger Alfred Hermida May 2, 2006 - excerpt:
The image is of an Arab woman holding up an ink-stained finger. On his blog Salam Adil, an Iraqi living in London, questions the use of the photo. In a thoughtful analysis he decontructs the image, asking if the photograph was staged and questioning its authenticity.
Whether or not he is right, it highlights how delicate the issue of trust is. As he concludes: "If you can't trust this image, how can you trust the media?"
Click here to see sidebar list of confirmed participants to date - ranging from Reuters CEO Tom Glocer to British blogger Suw Charman.
American blogger Ethan Zuckerman is blogging the conference he's not attending keeping us up to date with what's going on there from an American perspective.
Many of us have English as our mother tongue but come from hugely different cultural and educational backgrounds which means we don't or can't feel or see things in the same light. Not sure why I've just added that line, I guess it's a cryptic note to myself as a reminder for future reference, and while I'm at it, pointers re my question What is Propaganda? and definitions of Propaganda - information that is designed to make people feel a certain way or to believe a certain thing:
The information is usually political. It is hard to tell whether the information is true or false. Very often, the information is confusing and unfair. The word 'propaganda' comes from Latin. At first, it meant 'ideas to be spread around'. But in First World War, it came to mean 'political ideas that are supposed to be misleading'. Propaganda is like advertising in some ways. But advertising is usually trying to sell something and propaganda is usually political.The BBC's 'Have Your Say' now has its own blog.
PS Hello dear blogmates, sorry I've had to delete HaloScan commenting facility as email notification had broken and I couldn't access Admin to delete spam. It is possible to comment here via Blogger by clicking on the date at the end of each post. I'll have to contact Blogger for advice on how to fix template - meanwhile hope you don't mind continuing to email me instead.
# posted by Ingrid J. Jones @ 5/04/2006
3 comments
HOMEPAGE
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
January 2007
February 2007
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
January 2009
February 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
October 2009
November 2009
January 2010
June 2010
August 2010
Thank you to Blogger for this weblog - you can start yours for free now at:
Please contact me anytime
Email: Ingrid Jones
Wednesday, May 03, 2006
THE PERFECT TIME
01:02:03 on 04/05/06
In the early hours of Thursday morning, for just a second - the time will be exactly 01:02:03 on 04/05/06.
Or at least it will be in the UK and the majority of countries which list dates in day and month order. In the US, the same phenomenon was observed on 5 April.
And, boy, was it observed. Hundreds of American bloggers took the opportunity to pay their own tribute to this segment of time, with many aiming to upload updates at the precise second it occurred.
The blogs also prompted plenty of debate as to how often such times come about.
Full story BBC May 3, 2006.
IN JUST ONE SECOND IN THE UK
£22,880 is earned
£22,800 is spent
174 credit and debit card transactions
One in 44 chance someone will be born
Six people start plane journeys, 69 catch a train and 145 hop on a bus
Britons travel an average 4.2cm
£150 donated to charity
One in 102 chance of a wedding taking place
£881.53 spent on alcohol and cigarettes
(Based on Office of National Statistics annual figures)
JOHNNY BALL'S PUZZLE
How much time will elapse between 01:02:03 and 03:02:01?
Answer: one hour, 59 minutes, 58 seconds
01:02:03 on 04/05/06
In the early hours of Thursday morning, for just a second - the time will be exactly 01:02:03 on 04/05/06.
Or at least it will be in the UK and the majority of countries which list dates in day and month order. In the US, the same phenomenon was observed on 5 April.
And, boy, was it observed. Hundreds of American bloggers took the opportunity to pay their own tribute to this segment of time, with many aiming to upload updates at the precise second it occurred.
The blogs also prompted plenty of debate as to how often such times come about.
Full story BBC May 3, 2006.
IN JUST ONE SECOND IN THE UK
£22,880 is earned
£22,800 is spent
174 credit and debit card transactions
One in 44 chance someone will be born
Six people start plane journeys, 69 catch a train and 145 hop on a bus
Britons travel an average 4.2cm
£150 donated to charity
One in 102 chance of a wedding taking place
£881.53 spent on alcohol and cigarettes
(Based on Office of National Statistics annual figures)
JOHNNY BALL'S PUZZLE
How much time will elapse between 01:02:03 and 03:02:01?
Answer: one hour, 59 minutes, 58 seconds
ME and Ophelia
is the personal blog of Ingrid J. Jones
I live by the sea in England, United Kingdom
Here on my laptop I communicate to my friends
About things in general and my life with M.E. and cat Ophelia
Home user technology and business services
Food and household management
How it all impacts on my *lifestyle management programme*
And my battle for more energy.
My Blogger Profile
My other blogs:
Archive:
HOMEPAGE
July 2003
August 2003
September 2003
October 2003
November 2003
December 2003
January 2004
February 2004
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
January 2007
February 2007
September 2008
October 2008
November 2008
January 2009
February 2009
April 2009
May 2009
June 2009
July 2009
August 2009
October 2009
November 2009
January 2010
June 2010
August 2010